Whack Job: a Review

What’s the book? Whack Job: a History of Axe Murder by Rachel McCarthy James

How dark is it? Blood red, I suppose. Is that too on the nose?

How good is it? 2/10 hatchets

We only own a little hatchet, not a full-grown axe.

This book is less than 250 pages long. I don’t expect a thorough history of anything in that few pages, much less a history of both axes and murder. The first chapter introduces the far tighter exploration of how axe murder became a cultural meme, almost a joke. Okay, yeah, you could maybe do justice to that in 250 pages. Then we jump way back into prehistory and I know we’re in trouble. 

In trying to tell stories all the way from prehistory to the 21st century, the author has to settle for bare sketches and snippets. It would require heroic summarizing skill to do any of these stories justice in just a few pages, and this author does not have heroic summarizing skills. In describing the tragedy at Taliesin, for example, so much time is spent explaining Frank Lloyd Wright’s complicated love life that we barely have descriptions of the actual murderer or most of his victims. Confusion or meandering in the oldest cases might be excused by the lack of details and evidence handed down through the ages, but the modern well-documented cases are also summarized in unsatisfying ways and I was sometimes baffled by her choices of what to dwell on and what to leave out.

All this makes the book feel incoherent, more like sketches of vaguely axe-related moments in time than an actual history of any kind. This feeling of incoherence is compounded by the political lessons the author forces onto many of the stories, often with very little explanation or argument. The story of Stesagoras’s murder (an ancient one) seems chosen mostly as a dig at fascism and Trump’s infamous border wall, and many of the early American stories seem chosen primarily to remind us that slavery is bad and the U.S. did not (does not) treat Native Americans very well. All these things are true and important to talk about, but they’re not very axe-related and honestly, shoehorning these messages into such a light book doesn’t do them justice.

And speaking of American history, fully half of this book is devoted to U.S. axe murders. Again, they seem chosen not with an eye to explaining how axe murder became a pop culture thing, but to make various other points. If they were chosen with an eye to cultural significance, she might have included the Axe Man of New Orleans or the Villisca axe murders or highlighted some modern axe murders from beyond the United States. Some of the cases she chose were interesting but again, there was no sense of a coherent throughline. Just before the end, the author devotes a chapter to The Shining and So I Married an Axe Murderer as an attempt to tie everything back to pop culture but with no throughline to the previous chapters, this movie chapter felt jarring and out of place. It was especially jarring to jump from So I Married an Axe Murderer right into the grisly and sad murders of two Missouri men in 2019. That combo gave me emotional whiplash.

This book tries to weave together a whole lot of threads–axes, political history, true crime, pop culture–and it doesn’t do any of them justice. This book disappointed me greatly. That said, there were interesting tidbits here and there and I actually enjoyed the tiny interlude chapters explaining various historical axe types. I learned a bit about different axe designs and their various pros and cons. Turns out a history of actual axe design might be a real page-turner for me. This book, however, was not. 

True Story Tuesday: Expert Witness

What’s the book? Expert Witness by Ann W. Burgess and Steven M. Constantine

How dark is it? A nice greige, maybe? It’s not very graphic but it does discuss real crimes.

Is it good? On a scale from 1 to 10 gavels. I give it 8/10 gavels. Thoroughly gripping.

A few weeks ago I joined an online book club with a subscription service. Every month they send me a new bit of dark non-fiction and at the end of the month, they discuss it online. While I devote myself generally to fiction on this blog, I also like a true dark story. This seems like a perfect way to get my non-fiction fix.

I thoroughly enjoyed this month’s book. It starts with a bit of history, explaining how expert witnesses became a part of the legal process, but after that it becomes a deep dive into Ann Burgess’s greatest hits. I was hooked immediately; Ann Burgess has been involved in some monumental court cases. 

She’s generally an expert in trauma responses and the psychology of sexual violence, so the stories center around perpetrators and survivors of sexual violence. After discussing one of the first cases she worked on (which is not famous so she vagued up the details to protect the innocent) she tells us about her harrowing interview with Erik Menendez, her work on the Duke lacrosse team case, and her involvement with survivors of the horrendous crimes of Bill Cosby, among others. 

One of the main things that draws me to true crime is learning what goes through the heads of everyone involved, and this book focuses on exactly that. It’s detailed and insightful while still being quick and readable for the average citizen. It also feels like Burgess chose cases not just to highlight her high profile work but also to give us a well-rounded look at the psychology of victims and perpetrators alike. She puts a heavy emphasis on experts trying to be objective and careful in their assessments, without jumping to conclusions based on how sympathetic (or unsympathetic) a person is. The Menendez interview she details early on is a great example of her approach, I think.

In some ways, the book feels a bit shallow. I wouldn’t have minded a little more history and discussion of the big picture, or a deeper dive into the state of research on the psychology of trauma. I’m sure Burgess knows a lot about that and it sometimes feels like she’s holding back, expecting most readers to be focused on the famous cases and less interested in her actual research. I loved the former but I also would be fascinated by the latter. Still, this was a page-turner and I did enjoy her insights, which went much deeper than the average podcast or true crime documentary. It was definitely worth my time if only for that.